Abridging the Freedom of Speech in the Service of Israeli Power
People are free to speak their mind because freedom is a natural right. The First Amendment didn’t confer it. No government can give it. We’ll have to see if whores in Congress can take it away.
The United States House of Representatives has passed a proposed law called H.R. 6090, the “Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2023”. It’s gone up to the Senate where, if it is passed, will go to Biden for his inevitable signature and that will make it LAW.
Some speech now protected by the First Amendment [free speech and press freedom] seems challenged by this proposed law. What does 6090 mean? You can download the text and read it for yourself:
<< 118th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 6090
AN ACT
To provide for the consideration of a definition of antisemitism set forth by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance for the enforcement of Federal antidiscrimination laws concerning education programs or activities, and for other purposes...
<< This Act may be cited as the “Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2023”...
<< (1) title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance;..
(4) it is the policy of the United States to enforce such title against prohibited forms of discrimination rooted in antisemitism as vigorously as against all other forms of discrimination prohibited by such title; and
(5) as noted in the U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism issued by the White House on May 25, 2023, it is critical to—
(A) increase awareness and understanding of antisemitism, including its threat to America...
<< Congress finds the following:
(1) Antisemitism is on the rise in the United States and is impacting Jewish students in K–12 schools, colleges, and universities.
(2) The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (referred to in this Act as the “IHRA”) Working Definition of Antisemitism is a vital tool which helps individuals understand and identify the various manifestations of antisemitism.
(3) On December 11, 2019, Executive Order 13899 extended protections against discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to individuals subjected to antisemitism on college and university campuses and tasked Federal agencies to consider the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism when enforcing title VI of such Act…>>
So if this becomes law the “IHRA Working Definition of antiSemitism” will become the legal definition? And an American can be punished for contravening it?
What is "The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (referred to in this Act as the “IHRA”) Working Definition of Antisemitism”? The IHRA has a website:
<< Working definition of antisemitism
<< Read the full text of the IHRA’s non-legally binding working definition of antisemitism and learn more about this important tool with the FAQs below...
<< On 26 May 2016, the Plenary in Bucharest decided to:
Adopt the following non-legally binding working definition of antisemitism:
“Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”
To guide IHRA in its work, the following examples may serve as illustrations…
<< • Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust)… >>
OOPS! I have actually published articles on Facebook and on Substack setting forth the factual and documentary evidence that strongly supports the conclusion that the Auschwitz-Birkenau Forced Labour camp, between 1942 and 1944, could not possibly have gassed and cremated even I.1 million Jews (as claimed in 1992 by the Auschwitz Holocaust Museum), let alone 4 million which was what was originally claimed by the Soviets. The facilities documented to been designed and built and operated then and there were far too small and awkwardly designed to accomplish this.
The evidence, even the evidence on display at the Auschwitz Holocaust Museum, proves that Auschwitz-Birkenau was a forced labour, slave labour camp. That’s a terrible crime in itself and thousands of these enslaved people died of starvation, overwork and disease. But there were no trains arriving every day, no thousands of people arriving every day to be gassed and cremated every day to make way for the next load and the next …
There were only 48 single-body ovens among four facilities at most from 1942 through 1944. It takes an hour to cremate a 100 pound body. Even if these ovens were burning and off loading 48 people every hour on the hour 24/7 without breaking down, needing maintenance, needing fuel supplies – an obviously absurd scenario – the math doesn’t add up. Add in the loading up and running and off loading of these trains every day, the time that would take, the chances of breakdowns and maintenance problems. Add to that the consideration that Germany was straining every resource to supply combat operations by millions of soldiers using these vital and crowded rail lines going through Poland and it becomes obvious that the use of these lines to transport people not to be useful slaves but to be useless corpses to be cremated using valuable fuel … the scenario is about as plausible as Alice’s Wonderland.
That’s the bare bones of why I am 90% certain that though many Jews were persecuted and murdered at least no Jews or anybody else died by being industrially gassed and cremated at Auschwitz-Birkenau or anywhere else. These were slave labour camps, not “death camps”.
People, 2.3 million people right now as I write, are being kept behind razor wire and gun towers and have been denied food and water and medicines and have been bombed relentlessly for 7 months. You want to see a real death camp? It’s called Gaza.
Who is trying to deny that obvious fact? The Israelis. So who’s denying a holocaust here? Me or them?
And what else does anybody mean when they say “Jewish Holocaust”? They mean World War Two. They mean all those movies and documentaries about Auschwitz and trains and gas chambers. They mean what they saw in all those movies like "Sophie’s Choice” and counties others.
I’m saying that is and always was a false story.
So yes. I’m afraid I do doubt, even deny, "the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust)”
That’s what the IHRA defines as “the Holocaust”. I say it cannot have taken place as described.
So OOPS! I’m an anti-Semite? And this is going to become a matter of the police calling on me some day? If it’s going to be the law in the USA then Canada will soon follow. And we don’t even have a First Amendment.
You know what this starts to feel like? A fascist dictatorship. Isn’t THAT ironic! At least until irony becomes illegal, anyway.
And that ain’t ALL!
<< • Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel ... than to the interests of their own nations… >>
Hey there Anthony Blinken. Hey there US Congress where 90% of you people owe your campaign war chests to “contributions” from the billionaires of AIPAC. You people couldn’t be accused of being more loyal to Israel than to the land of your birth, could you?
You are trying to make it illegal to criticize Israel while it’s perfectly legal to criticize America. Maybe you should correct that imbalance and cancel that First Amendment entirely.
As Judge Andrew Napolitano said yesterday, the wording of the First Amendment was made specific for a reason:
“Congress shall make no law abridging THE freedom of speech..” The framers were saying that freedom of speech is a natural right, endowed by the Creator and it belongs to all people because we are are alive. No government gives freedom. It exists already and always. Governments can take it away but they can’t give it.
That is what is great about the US Constitution. We’ll have to see if whores in Congress will be able to destroy it.
Well done, you've made a very strong argument and a strong denunciation of the fuckery going on THIS TIME in the US Capital. Geeezuz, it's getting so tiresome. I like Napolitano, too.