9/11 Truth: You Can’t Keep a Secret
Murder will out. There are always loose threads. The internet has not changed that ineluctable truth. “The Intelligence Community” cannot control reality. Just ask the right question.
What’s that you say, Mr President? “Explosives” in the WTC Towers on 9/11?
A recent item on X reveals the inner workings of the “Intelligence Community” by spotlighting and revealing how the terror attacks of September 11, 2001 had to have been an inside job. The honcho of this inside coup d’état has to have been the “Intelligence Community”. And what is the “Intelligence Community”? That’s the CIA and it’s also its twin, Israeli Secret Intelligence, the Mossad.
Why, necessarily? Cui Bono? Who benefited from the instigation of the following 24 years of perpetual US warfare in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Afghanistan and now the culminating threat to destroy Iran. Who is clambering loud and long for the USA to destroy Iran? Israel. Who benefited from 9/11 and still does? Come ON! You can say it.
Come with me now to those thrilling days of yesteryear:
Red Pill Dispenser on X: "Wait, what did he say? Explosives? What explosives could he be talking about? https://t.co/xtwqQBdRk0" / X
https://x.com/redpilldispensr/status/1913896457859453133?s=49
The video is of President of the USA George W. Bush, shortly after Sept 11, 2001 telling the White House press corps that the CIA had told him accused Al-Qaeda mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed had “confessed" [as we know now, under extreme torture] that Al-Qaeda had placed “explosives" at the floors of the World Trade Center towers 1 and 2 below the impact zones so people could not escape before the towers collapsed.
The fact that this is nonsense only becomes apparent when one knows more about the towers’ construction to realize that the lower 80+ floors below impact zones could not possibly have “collapsed” without controlled explosive demolition. The very mention of explosives placed in the building, officially confirmed by the statement of the POTUS, would lead reporters and commentators by a mere flea’s leap to the truth. So no wonder if that statement out of George W. Bush’s loose and ignorant mouth has become so obscure that only the most insanely persistent digger into internet minutiae could have dug it up.
The CIA letting Bush say this was a serious mistake on their part. So they immediately told Bush it had been a mistake and not to mention it ever again – such is my supposition. This would be why we, the public, have never seen this before in all these years. Because it was immediately quashed and silenced after higher-ups in the CIA heard Bush mouth off about it. Heads must have rolled in the lower levels of the CIA at the time.
Why did Bush even say it? Why was he even told about it? Because the nature of military compartmentalization of information, the famous “need to know” system which had been invented for the Manhattan Project, ensures that “the big picture” is never known by the hundreds and thousands of those underlings who push buttons and place explosives and tell lies as part of the human machinery of any “covert” mission. So most of those who facilitated 9/11 – especially political flack balloons like Bush and Silverstein and Giuliani – did not know enough to know what not to say.
Example?
Larry Silverstein saying, about World Trade Center Tower 7, that he, Larry had been told that the decision was made to “pull” the building and that’s why it collapsed at about 5:30 p.m. that day. OOPS!! “Pull it” is controlled demolition terminology meaning to set off the prepared explosive charges which cut the supporting framework of a steel frame, hi rise building to bring it down.
Big BOO BOO, Larry! We don’t want to say “explosives”! That day Ruddy Giuliani was also not well enough informed to know he should not have said that he and his staff were warned that WTC Tower 7 would soon collapse. Rudy and Larry are often accused of being in on the plot. Truth is that the dumb things they said prove that they WERN’T in on the plot, not close enough to know how to not say stupid stuff. They were patsies who knew enough to do a function and knew enough not to look too closely at the reasons why.
Those like myself who try to delve into the true facts about issues like JFK’s assassination, or Israel’s illegal acquisition of nuclear warheads or the terror attacks of 9/11, always soon encounter the objection that such secret conspiracies are impossible because “hundreds of people must have known” and “you can’t keep a secret in the American government”. In a way these critics are correct. You can’t keep a secret. What you can do is bury secrets under a deeper and deeper snowdrift of absurdities and minutiae so that fact cannot be differentiated from “conspiracy theories”.
President Bush saying the forbidden word “explosives” is similar to Dick Cheney revealing the “angel is next” call very shortly after the 9/11 attacks. Cheney had not known enough to keep his mouth shut about that.
Dick Cheney told the White House press corps and the general public about the “Angel is next” call. Within hours Cheney reversed himself saying he had been mistaken and there had been no such call. This reversal is consistent with higher-ups in the CIA having realized the fatal implications of the “Angel” call and frantically papering it over. Just as they would have realized that the mention of “explosives” was a huge error and so it was papered over and is now so obscure that almost nobody knows where to look for the video clip.
What’s “angel is next”?
On the morning of September 11, 2001 President Bush had flown in AirForce One to Florida to do a publicity stunt. He was reading a story to an elementary school class when he was informed that the WTC Towers had been hit and the nation was under attack. Bush and his staff had taken off in AirForce One from Florida after leaving the school where Bush had heard of the attack. Soon after taking off, AirForce One received an anonymous radio warning saying, “Angel is next”, meaning, as all personnel and all White House staff and the president knew, that AirForce One was being threatened with some sort of attack, possibly a missile. “Angel” was the secret code word identifying AirForce One. This code word was changed every day as a routine precaution. So if the “terrorists” knew that code word this automatically must mean that they had to have been INTERNAL in the US highest levels of government security, the military “Intelligence Community". This is the inescapable logical conclusion following on that one small phrase, “Angel is next”.
The subsequent circumstances were consistent with the radio call having truly been received.
Before we go on, why does anybody still know about Bush’s gaff and Dick Cheney’s gaff? Why isn’t the video evidence destroyed? Why aren’t “THEY” in absolute control?
“That, detective, is the right question” – from the movie “I Robot”
Understand please, it is not practically possible in the 21st century to completely destroy video evidence. This is the double edge sword of internet documentation. The CIA practically invented the Internet by mass marketing the USENET military network throughout the 1980s and 1990s. This was an effort to control public opinion beyond controlling the legacy media. But in the process the developers of the internet had created a Frankenstein monster. Like the infamous fictional Victor Frankenstein they had not realized that their creation would be uncontrollable once galvanized. The amateur internet “hackers” of the 1980s – portrayed in the 1983 movie “War Games” – were a warning for the future. Now that every household in the civilized world has a computer connected to the world wide network of umpteen private servers, there is no possibility of controlling information anymore. Once a video is broadcast it is in the “cloud”, proliferating automatically so that it is indelible. The situational difficulties for the “Intelligence Community” in trying to contain a “covert” operation are not diminished by the popularization of internet communications. Rather the reverse. One could destroy paper documents and kill personal witnesses. But stopping video from proliferating is impossible.
In 1967 Jim Garrison had to subpoena the “Zapruder Film”, make hundreds of physical copies and courier the copies to hundreds of libraries throughout the USA so it couldn’t be destroyed. Now the equivalent of that film proliferates itself automatically.
So now we can know about Bush and Cheney’s gaffs and what happened to AirForce One after “Angel is next” squawked over the radio.
In the event, instead of heading directly for Washington, AirForce One immediately flew west out over the Gulf of Mexico then did a circle to the north heading for Texas. Two Air National Guard F-16s took off from the nearest Texas Air National Guard base and intercepted and escorted AirForce One. Note well, the ANG base and its pilots defied orders when they took off. General Ralph Eberhart, acting Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had ordered all continental US fighter planes to be at “standby”, which meant that they were to be fuelled and armed and ready but NOT TAKE OFF unless directly ordered to do so. Eberhart had given this order by cell phone that morning as he was on his way to Cheyenne Mountain to be in command of NORAD’s nuclear response.
Later critics asked if there had been a “stand down” order that morning which would explain the failure of NORAD to intercept the hijacked airliners before they hit the WTC and the Pentagon. It was not understood that Eberhart’s ordering a “standby” status was in effect just such a stand down order. The F-16s which took off to escort AIrForce One were in DEFIANCE of Eberhart’s order.
AirForce One proceeded to and landed at the nearest USAF base which was a central command hub for the US nuclear response. So the POTUS was now on site to order or prevent the activation of a possible strategic nuclear missile launch. This is circumstantial evidence that AirForce One had in fact received the “Angel is next” warning and its passengers had rightly deduced that this meant that the “terrorists” were an internal military coup whose principals knew not just the “Angel” code but also possibly had the codes for launching a nuclear missile.
The “Angel is next” call directly implies that the “9/11” terror plot personally threatened the entire White House including the POTUS. It is as much as saying to Bush and all of his staff, “We are in command of US military means and can kill all of you if we want to”.
There are loose threads. Always.
All you have to do is tug on one of those little threads and the whole shebang unravels.
This, in the end, is the real secret of 9/11: that one doesn’t really need to dig into minutiae. Just ask the 2000 year old question, “Who benefited by this crime?”
All the endless wars as a result of 9-11 have bankrupted America and made its billionaires even richer. I was an embedded reporter in Iraq and an observer in Syria, watching the tragedies there. Total waste of American resources. Our leaders will roast in hell for the genocide in Palestine alone. Don't even get me started on who benefited. Thank you for remembering the true story about 9-11. https://jpstillwater.blogspot.com/2025/04/bombs-over-yemen-why-americas-military.html
Hey, Jim!
Always a good read, my dear pal. BTW, there no LINK in that photo of Dubya... it's just a PHOTO. Does that make sense? If you can go to that sound byte, and copy the LINK for it, and then paste the LINK into your post, the video should come up. Holler if you need me. Gotta get out & about today, but I'll be around later. xo
And yeah, I imagine Dubya was NOT in the "loop." And I imagine they were trying out some DEW's, and Dr. Judy Wood has said... hence the "dustification," as she calls it. And I'd say Mossad, yes, and CIA. Oh, the troubles one has when trying to do Really Nasty Things... Cheers.