Was It Arson? Was It DEW?

Was the destruction of L.A. a deliberate campaign with official complicity? Did that complicity even extend to military weaponry?

To left, Lahaina. To Right, Palisades, L.A. Allegedly a firestorm. Why did the trees not burn?

Much speculation is current that some of the damage done to L.A. could be from a Directed Energy Weapon. Some people think this DEW is a laser, an aircraft or even a space based laser (I doubt it) and some think it’s a Microwave beam weapon (I like that better). I found evidence to suspect a microwave beam weapon in the cases of Lytton BC and Lahaina on Maui. Today the damage done to houses and buildings in L.A. also shows some of the same evidence.

But in a larger sense, I think that a DEW would be best seen as just another way to commit arson. More efficient and larger in scope in many ways but basically just another fire starter.

Suppose one were observing a murder trial and instead of debating whether intentional murder was done at all, counsellors were debating whether the crime was done with a knife or a gun? Isn’t debating whether arson was done with kerosene or a laser the same ridiculous folly?

Except that a DEW would be a military grade weapon of mass destruction comparable to a nuclear bomb.

I think there are good reasons to suspect that the Lytton fire and Lahaina fire and now the L.A. fires were deliberately set for political motives. The otherwise inexplicable negligence of officialdom which made things far worse than they should have been in every case is support for the theory that all these fires were deliberately set by hirelings who knew what they were doing. In every case it was a deliberate campaign of destruction. That is my opinion so far.

The debate about the use of a DEW has the danger that it distracts us from the main question. Which is: “Are there fires being deliberately set as a campaign of destruction with official complicity?”

However, bearing in mind all that, DEW evidence is worth discussing. It presents itself and it should be dealt with. I discussed the DEW idea in previous years and I think most of what I said still holds up to scrutiny.

Directed Energy Weapons do exist and maybe they could have been used in former instances and maybe now in L.A.

The way that the L.A. fires “broke out” one after the other in areas miles apart reminds me of 2023 when fires "broke out” all across northern Canada all at the same time as never before and never since. I suspected arson done with the aid of a DEW.

Today in L.A. fires were ignited in areas remote from one another in a similar fashion. And now the new “Auto fire” miles to the west of Palisades has “broken out”. All these are meth heads or homeless fools accidentally setting these fires or they’re accidental power-line ignitions? Why now and never in previous years when conditions were also dangerous and drug addicts were also plentiful? And why so co-ordinated-seeming?

I present some facts and I speculate. I don’t have answers. The principle problem bedevilling the DEW question is: What is the technical method of projecting and controlling these beams? We can see the bullet hole, where’s the gun?

I posted this to Facebook June 17, 2023:

Because the very recent catastrophic wildfires all across Canada started almost simultaneously and because arson has been officially alleged already here and there, there has been speculation that deliberate strikes by what is called “Directed Energy Weapons” caused these fires. This speculation is pooh-poohed by officialdom as conspiracy theory. But it reminds me of 2021 when there was a raging heat wave in BC and huge wildfires and the village of Lytton BC was burned out by a fire that had so many suspicious features that our Canadian blogger Polly “Amazing Polly” St George examined it critically. I was a big fan of Polly and still am. But I was reluctant to believe in “Directed Energy Weapons”. Her blog was saved on Bitchute and it’s a barn burner still.

The best way to find it is to Google "Amazing Polly Playlist (RUMBLE/BITCHUTE): 21.07.10 - Did the Global Mafia Burn Down Lytton, BC?”

As Polly pointed out, in late June 2021 in BC there was an extreme heat wave especially in the near-desert Lytton BC area, frequent location of record-breaking high temperatures when the BC summer is hot. At that time BC was scheduled to cancel its extreme Covid lockdown restrictions as of the coming July 1, 2021 (Canada Day. The province did indeed cancel the State of Emergency but next day the lockdown restrictions were re-imposed.)

In Lytton Dr Charles Hoffe was noting that his mostly aboriginal patients who had almost all gotten the Pfizer Covid inoculations were experiencing an extraordinary rate of severe post-vaccination reactions and Dr Hoffe was very outspoken about this.

On April 5, 2021, Hoffe wrote and had published an open letter to our Public Health Officer Bonnie Henry about these reactions and asking for some help for his patients. Meanwhile Hoffe was giving his vaccinated patients D-dimer tests to detect micro-clotting and he was finding this hard-to-detect clotting to an extraordinary degree in the vaccinated and distressed.

Then on June 30, 2021 the village of Lytton was swept lengthwise by a fire that destroyed the community so fast people barely escaped. Yet it was so strange to note that the houses were burnt to white ash while the surrounding trees did not ignite. One resident took a parting photo as he fled from his house which was already engulfed and yet – this haunts me as I look at this picture – the wooden fence mere feet from the house and the grass and trees nearby are untouched. How does a wildfire do that?

Photos of the devastation taken later show that the whole town looks like that; buildings and houses are consumed to white ash yet the trees between the houses did not ignite.The town looks like it was burnt “from the inside out”. First the houses, burnt so hot that the ash was white, then the surroundings were charred but not completely consumed. How does a natural fire do that?

The official word was that maybe a nearby fire combined with strong winds did this. But also lightning strikes were officially blamed. "Pyro-lightning" was alleged. This means that large fires can cause lightening strikes. Indeed, satellite radar detected over 9000 strikes on June 30 in the smoke plume in interior BC.

But satellite radar showed that the strikes were in straight-line and box shaped patterns. This made people remember the HAARP (High Altitude Auroral Research Project) 33-acre array of microwave producing towers in Alaska then owned by U of Alaska Fairbanks. This array of towers is said to produce and aim microwave radiation into the ionosphere to study its effects on the atmosphere.

Back then in 2021 I was skeptical of this HAARP connection. It seemed so easy to dismiss it. A mainstream article said HAARP was far too low energy to cause such strikes and I was ready to put it in the “grey file”. But now I’ve seen more evidence and, as reluctant as I am to go there, I felt I had to actually read an article that Polly St George suggested in 2021:

<< U.S. HAARP program can alter weather and disrupt communications by William Thomas on April 18th, 1996 at 9:00 AM

<< From a site located about halfway between Anchorage and Fairbanks, at a place called Gakona, a series of experiments dubbed the High Altitude Auroral Research Project was designed to beam millions of watts of energy into Earth’s highly charged ionosphere. HAARP’s inventor, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology physicist named Bernard Eastlund, was excited about the possibilities. “You can virtually lift part of the atmosphere,” Eastlund told Omni. “You can make it move, do things to it.”…

<< Commercial radio stations commonly broadcast in all directions at 50,000 watts; no one can predict exactly what will happen as scheduled HAARP tests begin radiating two, four, or 10 billion watts of power. But previous electromagnetic experiments in the ionosphere have been accompanied by a displaced jet stream and erratic weather often enough for some people to rule out coincidence…

<< All these outcomes hinge on the ionosphere, an electrically active region of the upper atmosphere extending from about 55 to 900 kilometres out from Earth. Unlike the atmosphere around us, which carries no electrical charge, the ionosphere flows with the fluctuations of charged particles bombarding Earth from countless suns.

<< The stripping of electrons from the atoms in these cosmic rays turns the atoms into positively charged ions, which remain in the ionosphere. The pared electrons continue inbound along Earth’s magnetic-field lines, funnelling toward the magnetic poles in tornadolike spouts called the electrojet... Even the official U.S. air force “HAARP Fact Sheet”, issued in November 1993 by the Office of Naval Research and the U.S. Air Force Geophysical Laboratory, admitted that “ionospheric disturbances at high latitudes also can act to induce large currents in electric power grids.”…

<< ... After a series of crashes linked to electrical interference, the U.S. air force launched a three-year Joint Electromagnetic Interference Investigation in 1991. Official JEMI findings showed that “radio waves at certain frequencies can bring down an aircraft by putting it into an uncommanded turn or dive, or by turning off its fuel supply.”…

<< Sometime in 1997, Phase 2 tests will heat a small region of the upper atmosphere with four billion watts of highly concentrated power... With high-speed computers and newly developed software pulsing powerful radio waves, HAARP’s antennae will be fired sequentially to steer this ionospheric bulge as if it were a lens. The U.S. air force hopes to use it to fry incoming warheads... Other offensive capabilities noted in the patent include “altering the upper atmosphere wind patterns using plumes of atmospheric particles as a lens or focusing device” to disturb weather thousands of miles away…

<< The Soviet Union and the United States have been interested in the ionosphere since the 1950s, when it was discovered that high-power radio transmissions change the temperature and density of electrons there... But these earlier ionospheric heaters aimed energy straight up in an expanding cone; their effective radiated power dissipated rapidly.

<< HAARP, however, directs its energy in an inverted cone. By focusing the beam on a very small area of the ionosphere, there is, in effect, an enormous increase in power over the affected area. As the six-page “HAARP Fact Sheet” explains, no other heater has “the combination of frequency capability and beam steering agility required to perform the experiments planned for HAARP”... “The name of the game is, can you accelerate electrons?” Eastlund told the Straight. “That was what my patents were on, and that was one of the purposes stated in the original HAARP document.”... >>

At this point I pause to emphasize: “beam steering agility” and “accelerate electrons... that was one of the purposes”. My point is that accelerated electrons are what lightning bolts are made of. And if HAARP could generate a beam with four billion or even ten billion watts of power and “steer” its “beam” to affect the atmosphere above remote areas does HAARP not qualify as a device to generate and focus lightening strikes at great distances from the HAARP array? What is this if it isn’t a “Directed Energy Weapon”?

So HAARP was perfectly capable of generating and directing lightening strikes at great distances from the array over 20 years ago. They lied then when they said it wasn’t. What have these military-funded, military-controlled, white-coated science cowboys developed since then?

Blogger Peggy Hall has interviewed arborist and fire investigator Robert Brame [Google "LOOKING FOR CLUES in the CANADIAN FIRES - YouTube]

<<Robert Brame is a forensic arborist who has analyzed 38 California fires and has come up with hundreds of photographic evidence of IMPOSSIBLE [to have been] normal fire behavior. Let's use this information to help us look for CLUES in the CANADIAN fires to see if the same anomolies exist.>>

Photographic evidence has been gathered from dozens of brush fire aftermaths in California and other west coast areas by arborist Robert Brame, an expert in trees and forest fires of almost 50 years’ experience. He knows what species of trees and plants burn and how they burn. In the last few years he began to see wildfires which were shockingly different than the natural fires he had seen for most of his life.In a natural fire the trees burn first from the outside in, burning first the needles and leaves of resinous species. Especially Eucalyptus and Pine are flammable. You can ignite a California Eucalyptus with a cigarette lighter because it is so resinous even when green. Meanwhile very water loving trees like the Willow family burn last. So in a natural fire first the forest burns then the houses catch fire. The ash is black because combustion is incomplete.

But these photos from 36 of the 38 aftermath scenes of wildfires Brame has visited and photoed in the last 15 years show trees burned from the inside out, cooked but the leaves or needles did not burn, even pine needles and eucalyptus leaves. Nearby houses, where ever there is metal, are burned so completely they are white ash with melted metal and melted glass debris and yet the trees nearby did not burn. The trees with the most water content burn first or are cooked from the inside out leaving a black empty centre with an unburned shell. Some photos are of trees still burning from the inside while the bark is not yet burned and surroundings are not on fire.

Brame collected photos of burned-out rural neighbourhoods, towns and villages said to have been destroyed by forest fires, where the houses were reduced to flat patches of white ash yet the trees among the houses did not ignite.What kind of a fire behaves like this? Put a metal object in your microwave oven and you’ll find out. In your microwave oven plastic does not melt and your food cooks from the inside out because microwave radiation excites first the water content of your food, water being nature's primary carrier of electric energy in the air and in living bodies. Iron, along with steel and aluminum, is the second most active carrier of electricity. This is why microwave energy, which is electromagnetic energy, excites and heats water and ferrous metals or aluminum in your microwave oven.These photos are evidence of microwave induced fires. No other phenomenon besides microwave energy can explain this evidence. I’d love to dismiss this terrifying possibility but I can’t. There’s too much evidence that can’t be explained any other way.

Later in the video "Looking For Clues in the Canadian Fires", other photos taken by Mr Brame show that fire hot enough to melt aluminum, even vaporize aluminum, and melt glass (2400o F whereas a wood burning forest fire burns at 1400o F maximum) is seen wherever there is metal and yet nearby or even connected wood has not ignited. Notably, where nails or bolts contact wood, as at fence posts or guard rails, the metal got immediately hot enough to char the wood but cooled so fast that the wood beyond the charred area was not heated long enough to ignite. Likewise plastic items – such as plastic toys and garbage bins and outdoor swimming pools and kids swing sets made of plastic – have not burned or melted as they would in a natural brush or forest fire.

What has immediately heated up is what conducts electricity – that is, metal and water; what does not conduct electricity is heated SECONDARILY, if at all.

It is evident that during the “cleanup” of fire damaged areas underground pipes and culverts made of metal have been dug up and replaced by plastic or concrete pipes or culverts. These metal pipes and culverts which have been dug up and replaced and carelessly left at fire sites show evidence of having been severely heat damaged even though they were buried several feet deep. Someone at decision-making levels knew that these buried pipes would have been damaged in this way and ordered that the damaged pipes should be replaced not with metal pipes – NOT with METAL! – but with plastic or concrete which, of course, does not conduct electricity.

It is evident that deliberate official efforts have been made to removed the conspicuously unburned and unmelted plastic from burned towns by hired clean-up crews. It is evident that the contact areas between metal bolts and aluminum guard rails which were seen to have burned and vaporized the aluminum have been replaced with plastic blocks as buffers. The conclusion has to be that there is some level of knowledge among people who make these decisions at the State (villages and towns and State parks) and/or federal (national parks) levels that these fires are not normal fires. Knowledge by some governmental officials that these fires have something to do with electrical conductivity is evident.

Efforts are being ordered to be made to disguise the abnormal characteristics of these fires from the public. The only reasonable conclusion is that some public officials at the decision- making levels in government departments (fire suppression and forestry management bureaucracies I presume?) have been charged by some superior (and covert) decision makers with the task of re-enforcing official narratives in the public mind about the nature of and the causes of these fires to make it seem that “natural” causes exist (wind and embers, etc.) whereas unnatural causes which the evidence in fact indicates – microwave energy and electrical conductivity causes – do not exist.

Maybe I’m wrong. I hope I am. And it’s certainly not proof that our Canadian wildfires, or some of them, might have been ignited this way. But I have to say it’s possible.

I also have to say, given what is in the 1996 article on HAARP, that specific directing of wind patterns by electronic interference in the ionosphere is also possible.

Such that New York City could be deliberately and completely blanketed in thick smoke within a space of less than an hour while intervening territories were not so blanketed. This is exactly what happened to New York City days ago. [that was in June, 2023 during a wave of forest fires all across Canada which our PM was blaming on “climate change”] Now NYC is clear again.

Amazing Polly Playlist (RUMBLE/BITCHUTE)

http://gndzerosrv.com/WebPages/amazingpolly/index.html

21.07.10-Did the Global Mafia Burn Down Lytton, BC? LOOKING FOR CLUES in the CANADIAN FIRES - YouTube